Cost estimation of structural work for residential building with seismic design consideration

Hanis Athirah, Roslan and Nur Shairah, Zulkhibri and Faisal, Ade and Mohd Irwan, Adiyanto (2023) Cost estimation of structural work for residential building with seismic design consideration. International Journal of Integrated Engineering, 15 (2). pp. 263-272. ISSN 2229-838X. (Published)

	Pdf Cost estimation of structural work for residential building.pdf Restricted to Repository staff only Download (802kB) | Request a copy
Preview	Pdf Cost estimation of structural work for residential building with seismic design consideration_ABS.pdf Download (148kB) | Preview

Abstract

The Sumatra-Andaman earthquakes had triggered local earthquakes in Malaysia by reactivation of ancient inactive faults. Previously on 5th June 2015, Ranau, a region located in Sabah, Malaysia, had experienced a moderate earthquake of Mw6.1. The structural failures occurred because all existing buildings only designed for gravity load without any seismic provision. Recent research work exhibits the seismic designs’ impact on the cost of material and its parameters that impact the cost. There are two types reinforced concrete residential buildings called Type 1 and Type 2 for two storey and four storey which had been used as models. This research applied four seismicity levels to the reference peak ground acceleration value, αgR = 0.07g, 0.10g, 0.13g & 0.16g, and two soil types: Soil Types B and D. The result shows that for two storey reinforced concrete residential buildings on soil types B and D, seismic design increases structural work costs, which is around 0.62% to 1.31% and 0.61% to 2.16%, respectively, for Type 1 model compared to non-seismic design. Besides, model Type 2, the increment is around 0.24% to 1.22% and 0.20% to 1.71%, respectively. Otherwise, for reinforced concrete residential building with four storey on soil types B and D, the result shows that seismic design tends to have a higher structural work’s cost around 0.41% to 2.48% and 0.98% to 11.23%, respectively, for Type 1 model. Besides, for model Type 2 the increment is around 1.80% to 2.05% and 2.34% to 8.53%, respectively, compared to non-seismic design.

Item Type:	Article
Additional Information:	Indexed by Scopus
Uncontrolled Keywords:	Cost estimation; Eurocode 8; National Annex; Seismic design; Structural work
Subjects:	T Technology > T Technology (General) T Technology > TA Engineering (General). Civil engineering (General)
Faculty/Division:	Institute of Postgraduate Studies Faculty of Civil Engineering Technology
Depositing User:	Mr Muhamad Firdaus Janih@Jaini
Date Deposited:	30 Apr 2024 06:26
Last Modified:	30 Apr 2024 06:26
URI:	http://umpir.ump.edu.my/id/eprint/40511
Download Statistic:	View Download Statistics

Actions (login required)

View Item