Assessment of integrated assembly sequence planning and line balancing optimization using metaheuristic algorithms

Mohd Fadzil Faisae, Ab Rashid and Ullah, Wasif and Muhammad Ammar, Nik Mu’tasim (2024) Assessment of integrated assembly sequence planning and line balancing optimization using metaheuristic algorithms. In: 2024 IEEE 6th Symposium on Computers & Informatics (ISCI). 2024 IEEE 6th Symposium on Computers & Informatics (ISCI) , 10 August 2024 , Kuala Lumpur, Malaysia. pp. 55-59.. ISSN 2996-6752 ISBN 979-8-3503-5385-3 (Published)

Pdf
Assessment_of_Integrated_Assembly_Sequence_Planning_and_Line_Balancing_Optimization_Using_Metaheuristic_Algorithms.pdf
Restricted to Repository staff only
Download (1MB) | Request a copy

Preview

Pdf
Assessment of integrated assembly sequence planning_ABST.pdf
Download (1MB) | Preview

DOI/Official URL: https://doi.org/10.1109/ISCI62787.2024.10668162

Abstract

In assembly optimization, there has been an integration of Assembly Sequence Planning (ASP) and Assembly Line Balancing (ALB) optimization, taking into account the advantages of improved solution quality, reduced error rates, and faster time-to-market for products. Previously, only a limited number of publications explored the integrated ASP and ALB optimization. These studies primarily compared the performance of algorithms within the Genetic Algorithm and Ant Colony Optimization classes. Moreover, the number of test problems used in these works was restricted to only three problems. In an ideal scenario, the efficacy of an algorithm can only be deduced when it is tested across a wide range of problem types. In this paper, the performance of six different metaheuristic algorithms for optimizing integrated ASP and ALB are compared. These algorithms include Genetic Algorithm (GA), Ant Colony Optimization (ACO), and Particle Swarm Optimization (PSO). To rigorously test these metaheuristic algorithms, 45 test problems of various sizes were employed to evaluate their performance across different categories. The results show that ACO outperforms in larger sized problems, while PSO exhibits potential to be explored further due to its satisfactory overall performance in terms of solution quality and distribution.

Item Type:	Conference or Workshop Item (Paper)
Uncontrolled Keywords:	Assembly sequence planning; Line balancing; Metaheuristics; Manufacturing system; Optimization
Subjects:	T Technology > TJ Mechanical engineering and machinery T Technology > TS Manufactures
Faculty/Division:	Faculty of Mechanical and Automotive Engineering Technology Institute of Postgraduate Studies Centre for Automotive Engineering (Automotive Centre) Faculty of Manufacturing and Mechatronic Engineering Technology
Depositing User:	Dr. Mohd Fadzil Faisae Ab. Rashid
Date Deposited:	02 Oct 2024 04:15
Last Modified:	02 Oct 2024 04:15
URI:	http://umpir.ump.edu.my/id/eprint/42703
Download Statistic:	View Download Statistics

Actions (login required)

View Item